|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"I Deserve a Discount, Doctor"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Over the past few columns of The Dentist's Network, we have examined many of the factors that go into upgrading the practice towards a chartless system. While many of these concepts are important in the planning stages, it is apparent that the push towards digital radiography is the driving force at this time. While surveys show that less than 50% of offices currently use digital systems, these same surveys seem to show that many dentists are considering adding digital radiography to the practice in the next 12 months. We looked at phosphor plate systems in my last column, so let's turn our attention toward hard sensors now.
The majority of dentists who currently own digital radiography have sensor-based systems. Since I don't expect this trend to change anytime soon, I would like to review the different criteria that dentists should consider when picking a system that is right for their office. This is simply meant to be a primer; dentists should contemplate working with a consultant since this decision can have far-reaching implications on the practice as a whole.
Resolution
The number that most companies advertise when marketing their systems is line pairs per millimeter (lp/mm). Many sensor based systems will be able to produce an image with at least 15 lp/mm; some are in the 25 lp/mm. The question becomes: Will a sensor with more resolution produce a better image than one with less resolution? Not necessarily. As we’ve discussed in past issues, image quality will be related to many factors, such as the monitor you are using and software that is interpreting the image. It has actually been shown that the human eye cannot reliably distinguish images that have more than 10 lp/mm. The better resolution will only come into play when magnifying the image to a large size either on the screen or when printing. If you enlarge an image further and further, the image with less resolution will begin to degrade and show pixilation earlier than the higher resolution image. As far as printing, the resolution will become important when printing images larger than 8” X 10”. For most offices, the lp/mm issue is not as important as the sensor companies might like us to believe.
Size
One of the goals of the sensor companies is to allow dentists an easy transition from a film-based practice to a digital practice. Most accomplish this by creating sensors that simulate the size of film. The vast majority of companies produce both a #1 and #2 sized sensor. A few also make a size #0 sensor, although few offices use these. On the other side of the coin, a couple of vendors believe that there is no need for separate sensors and they produce a “one size fits all” sensor. While this type of system may reduce costs, offices will find that there are situations where a small sensor is needed. Some examples would be for pedo patients, patients with tori, or constricted mandibles.
Comfort
Most vendors are moving towards a thinner sensor. While a few are still in the 5-6 mm range, the industry standard is around 4 mm right now. However, the thickness of the sensor is usually not crucial in determining comfort. Instead, it is the actual design of the sensor casing and the corners that play a more important role. Some are square, some rounded, some octagonal. Dentists should try the different sensors for comfort if this is an important part of the decision for them. Many companies make holders for sensors that will also have a large affect on the patient and operator experience. Many use a RINN style holder, but there are certainly a number of variations and other systems in use.
Cost
For many dentists, this is probably the most important factor. While the costs of the various systems have continued to decline (in most cases), these are still a significant investment. Not even considering the costs of computers, monitors, networks, and software, the average price of a #2 sensor system is around $5000-7500 right now. There are a few that can be found for under $5000, a bunch priced in the $7000-9000 range, and a couple above that. Dentists should also be aware that most sensors come with only minimal warranties, and extending those warranties will cost $500-$2000 per year per sensor, so this should be factored into the final cost.
There is no perfect digital radiography system. Each dentist must decide which factors are important and base their decision on that. There is no right or wrong; only what is best for you.
Lorne Lavine, DMD is the Founder and President of Dental Technology Consultants. Dr. Lavine holds two prestigious certifications, the A+ Certified Technician designation and the Network+ Certified Professional. These designations demonstrate proficiency in computer repair, operating systems, network design and installation. Dental Technology Consultants provides dentists a full range of services relating to the implementation of technology.
Interested in having Dr. Lavine speak to your dental society or study club? Click here. Dr. Lavine can be reached at drlavine@thedentistsnetwork.net.
Hear Dr. Lavine's FREE podcasts at The Dentist's Network - HERE
Forward this article to a friend.

|
Many practitioners are still experiencing lower than expected growth due to our sluggish economy. There is a strategy for you to consider which has been growing in popularity, proving to be a win/win proposition for both parties. Have you considered purchasing a practice in your area from a dentist who is not yet ready to retire, but is willing to spend the last few years of his or her professional career with you? Perhaps there is a dentist in your vicinity who practices in a “home office” environment or may be facing a lease expiration in the near future but prefers not to renew.
Obviously, this strategy works best if your facility is under-utilized. By developing a facility sharing agreement accompanied with a mandatory buy-out, you achieve better use of your facility immediately, as well as create additional income for yourself. In the long term, once the candidate retires you will have a larger patient base, which may prove helpful in recruiting an associate for your own transition plans - not to mention a practice that will command a higher fair market value.
Here is an example of how this strategy works. Let's assume the proposed candidate has a small practice consisting of 400 to 600 patient records. The candidate wants to continue practicing and will retire in two years. The first step will be to form a facility sharing arrangement whereby the candidate retains his/her own business entity, pays you rent as well as perhaps some other facility usage charges, and then sells you the patient list upon retirement. In this scenario, we recommend that a formula for a future purchase price be agreed upon at the onset.
One way to calculate a sale price is to use a multiple (percentage) of the last twelve months of the candidate's entire gross collections prior to the sale.
The candidate’s gross collections should also include any revenue that you or other providers in your practice produced in that twelve-month period. Proper coding of all procedures is a must, especially those services that are referred internally within your practice. You can create unique doctor and/or hygienist codes to track this referred production/revenue. Oftentimes an older practitioner refers many procedures to area specialists. If you so choose, you now have the opportunity to perform some of these previously “referred” services, such as endo and perio, advanced restorative, etc., thus increasing your own clinical production immediately, as well as increasing the future practice value for the retiring doctor. If you already have an associate, some of these services can be provided by him/her.
This approach provides a win-win scenario, boosting your income immediately and giving the retiring doctor a bonus on his/her practice's value, since the revenue generated by your efforts is credited to his/her future value. In fact, it will create an incentive for your candidate to refer procedures to you while he/she is still practicing in your facility! For example, if the candidate generated $300,000, and you or your staff produced an additional $75,000 over the last twelve-month period, you would use a revenue number for valuation purposes of $375,000. However, you have benefitted in the short run from increased income for those additional services. The candidate wins from their referring patients internally and receives a higher sale price. Chances are there is still plenty of incomplete treatment remaining in these patient records as well.
Contracts should be prepared before the candidate actually relocates to your practice, so there are no surprises in your business arrangement on either party's behalf. These agreements would typically be a Facility Sharing Agreement and an Asset Purchase Agreement.
Creating this type of a transition plan becomes “a win” for both parties, because it:
If you would like additional help, email Dr. Snyder at drsnyder@thedentistsnetwork.net.
Interested in having Dr. Snyder speak to your dental society or study club? Click here.
Hear Dr. Snyder's FREE podcasts at The Dentist's Network - HERE
Forward this article to a friend.
![]()